[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: iSCSI: No Framing
I also agree with this approach. Consensus is still a way out, significant work is being done on various fronts to solve some of the fundamental issues blocking consensus, and we should not block the iSCSI spec waiting for consensus. Rip the sucker out. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Amir Shalit [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:29 PM To: Mark S. Edwards; email@example.com Subject: RE: iSCSI: No Framing In second thought this is the preferred solution for now. Not selecting any type of framing until more progress at the transport level which may include running iSCSI on a modified TCP protocol etc. Amir -----Original Message----- From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of Mark S. Edwards Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:49 AM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: iSCSI: No Framing At 10:46 PM 1/29/2002 -0800, WENDT,JIM (HP-Roseville,ex1) wrote: >Perhaps we should discuss the possibility of not >specifying any framing mechanism (FIM or COWS) in the >first version of iSCSI. Nicely put Jim. My current opinion is that this issue has contributed to a delay in getting this spec out in to the wild. This issue MUST be closed next week and I don't see anything close to a consensus. My preferred approach is to drop this issue now and to look at it at a later date in terms of an IPS re-charter when we get to thinking about version 2 of iSCSI or have some good approaches proposed by the tsvwg or the RDMA WG. Mark.
Last updated: Thu Jan 31 19:17:56 2002
8578 messages in chronological order