Re: iSCSI: WWName mapping to iSCSI names (Was Re: Differences between iSCSI Router ..)

[Sukanta ganguly <sganguly@yahoo.com>]

I don't have one now, but am working on defining one.
All I was trying to state in my reply to the Camden
was the WWN does exist and can be leveraged for the
unique identification.


SG
--- Sajay Selvaraj <sselvara@npd.hcltech.com> wrote:
> Sukanta,
> 
>    I suppose you are referring to an FC node. I
> remember an old thread on 'a standard
> way of representing/mapping WWNames in iSCSI' ? This
> was with special reference to
> iSCSI-FC address mapping. Any new ideas on a
> standard way to do this ?
> 
> Regards,
> Sajay
> 
> Camden,
>    I would like to add a point here that there is
> the World Wide Name (WWN) convention that is
> responsible for a unique identification of a storage
> device.
>    
> SG
> 
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
> 
> On 1/15/2002 at 10:34 AM Naveen Nimmu wrote:
> 
>         [snip]
> <sniped>
> -- 
> http://san.hcltech.com
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/