Re: iSCSI: Markers

["Mark S. Edwards" <marke@muttsnuts.com>]

At 09:51 AM 1/11/2002 -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
>Apart from taking a position on 1-5, we need to take a position on
>mandatory vs. optional to implement.
>
>I don't have strong views right now on which of 1-5 is best for those
>who want to cast their iSCSI protocol processing into silicon.  But I
>do have views on what these things cost in software, so for any of
>options 1..4 I would object to a "mandatory to implement" requirement.
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Ditto.

Mark.