Re: iSCSI:

To: "Eddy Quicksall" <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>
Subject: Re: iSCSI:
From: "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 07:12:57 +0200
Cc: "ips@ece. cmu. edu \(E-mail\)" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>, owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 001BBD0DC2256B2A_="
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

markers - Julo

"Eddy Quicksall" <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>
Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

19-12-01 22:00

To: "ips@ece. cmu. edu \(E-mail\)" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
cc:
Subject: iSCSI:

This quote is from section 5.3. Can someone give an example of such a case?

Whenever parameter action or acceptance is dependent on other

parameters, the dependent parameters MUST be sent after the

parameters they depend on. If they are sent within the same command

a response for a parameter might imply responses for others.

Eddy

Home

Last updated: Wed Jan 02 01:17:49 2002
8244 messages in chronological order