SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    ISCSI: Padding Preceding CRC



    
    
    Isnt padding independent of CRC?
    
    
    
                                                                                                                                                   
                        "Williams, Jim"                                                                                                            
                        <Jim.Williams@e       To:     "'ips@ece.cmu.edu'" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>                                                        
                        mulex.com>            cc:                                                                                                  
                        Sent by:              Subject:     Padding Preceding CRC                                                                   
                        owner-ips@ece.c                                                                                                            
                        mu.edu                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                   
                        11/08/2001                                                                                                                 
                        02:29 PM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                   
    
    
    
    The iSCSI spec indicates that the data will be padded
    out to a length which is a multiple of 4 before the
    CRC (digest) is appended.  In discussing this with our
    hardware designers, I was told that this provides
    no benefit to them, but causes a fair amount of pain.
    As such I would like to raise the question of
    whether the padding should be eliminated.
    
    Computing unaligned CRCs is fairly trivial to do,
    and must be done anyway.  This is because the
    padding aligns the CRC with respect to the iSCSI
    PDU, but one can't in general assume that the
    iSCSI PDU is aligned with the TCP segment on
    received data, and on transmitted data the
    source may be a general gather list of unaligned
    buffers.
    
    I suppose this doesn't preclude doing a lot of
    work to align the data before feeding it to the
    CRC unit, but given how easy it is to compute
    unaligned CRCs in hardware, there is no reason
    to do this.
    
    Inserting padding is extra work, however.  This
    creates a bubble in the data flow pipe, extra
    information that must be passed between hardware
    units indicating the number of pad bytes to
    be inserted, and extra logic to insert the
    required pad data.
    
    If someone can make a case why this padding is
    a good thing, then certainly the hardware
    problems are solvable.  But it looks to me
    like a "feature" with cost but no benefit.
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Fri Nov 09 07:17:38 2001
7684 messages in chronological order