|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI: IPsec tunnel / transport mode decision
Bill,
I agree that you can make external devices that support transport mode,
but it seems that most of those existing today do not support it.
Anyway for our required decision... you also said you prefer tunnel mode,
right ?
Regards,
Ofer
Ofer Biran
Storage and Systems Technology
IBM Research Lab in Haifa
biran@il.ibm.com 972-4-8296253
"Bill Strahm" <bill@Sanera.net> on 04/11/2001 21:39:22
Please respond to "Bill Strahm" <bill@Sanera.net>
To: Ofer Biran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, <saqibj@margallacomm.com>
cc: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Subject: RE: iSCSI: IPsec tunnel / transport mode decision
Ok,
How does mandatory Transport mode remove the possibility of external
IPsec...
I have said before I can make IPsec transport & tunnel mode work in
external
devices, just like you can do SSL/TLS accelerators both internally and
externally
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
Ofer Biran
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 4:27 AM
To: saqibj@margallacomm.com
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: RE: iSCSI: IPsec tunnel / transport mode decision
Saqib,
Mandatory transport mode would make bundling of external IPSec
impossible, while tunnel mode is not more difficult to implement
within the iSCSI endpoint than transport mode.
"Cost of ownership and complexity of deploying a stand-alone
IPsec gateway" might be among the considerations of vendors and
customers, but I don't think the standard should block such
solutions (and it blocks more than just stand-alone IPsec
gateway).
Regards,
Ofer
Ofer Biran
Storage and Systems Technology
IBM Research Lab in Haifa
biran@il.ibm.com 972-4-8296253
"Saqib Jang" <saqibj@margallacomm.com> on 02/11/2001 20:59:03
Please respond to <saqibj@margallacomm.com>
To: "Bill Strahm" <bill@sanera.net>, "CAVANNA,VICENTE V
(A-Roseville,ex1)" <vince_cavanna@agilent.com>
cc: "SHEEHY,DAVE (A-Americas,unix1)" <dave_sheehy@agilent.com>, Ofer
Biran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Subject: RE: iSCSI: IPsec tunnel / transport mode decision
What about the cost of ownership and complexity of deploying
a stand-alone IPsec gateway for use with IPsec end-points?
If transport-mode IPsec is a must-to-implement capability in
iSCSI end-points there is an opportunity to have much
more coherent security for iSCSI.
Saqib
Home Last updated: Tue Nov 06 17:17:30 2001 7590 messages in chronological order |