RE: FCencap: Missing SOF/EOF characters

["Elizabeth Rodriguez" <egrodriguez@lucent.com>]

Chair hat off --

 

Inclusion of this information sounds good to me.

Locale of information does not matter to me as much.

As mentioned in previous email, we may also want to include the 'why not appropriate' in annex, for reader's information.

 

Elizabeth

 -----Original Message-----
From: Franco Travostino [mailto:travos@nortelnetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:23 AM
To: ENDL_TX@computer.org; IPS Reflector
Subject: Re: FCencap: Missing SOF/EOF characters

Ralph,
why should we be waiting until 5.3 (last page) to break this news (e.g., Class 1 isn't supported)?
Can we move your text up to section 1, aptly titled "Scope". Alternately, we could narrow down the very title of the document.

0.02
-franco

At 07:33 AM 11/1/2001, Ralph Weber wrote:

Off and on I hear complaints that it is not obvious
why draft-ietf-ips-fcencapsulation-03.txt fails to
list all the possible Fibre Channel SOF and EOF
characters in 5.3.

To address this concern, I propose adding the following
text at the end of 5.3.

  Note: Some of the SOF and EOF characters defined by
  Fibre Channel are not listed in Table 1 and Table 2
  because the design an operating characteristics
  of an IP Network make it inappropriate for
  transporting FC Frames containing those SOF and/or
  EOF characters.

I proposed to make this addition in a new draft that
will be available in time for consideration in Salt
Lake.

Comment appreciated.

Ralph Weber

Franco Travostino, Director Content Internetworking Lab
Advanced Technology Investments
Nortel Networks, Inc.
600 Technology Park
Billerica, MA 01821 USA
Tel: 978 288 7708 Fax: 978 288 4690
email: travos@nortelnetworks.com