Re: iSCSI:Changes in Loging Negotiation

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

John,

You are right technically.  I assume that for the plugfest that was the way people implement this anyhow.
The only difference is that the previous text did no mandate this behavior while the current test is strict (beyond what I judged as necessary). To help I am going to post on my site a pdf called 8a - that will be an errata to 8 with changes
marked.

Julo

John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu 05-10-01 03:38 Please respond to John Hufferd

To:        ips@ece.cmu.edu         cc:                 Subject:        iSCSI:Changes in Loging Negotiation

Now that Julian has made the latest change, I think we are now polishing
the knobs.  We have a Plugfest coming up which is going to use version 8.
(Maybe we can get in Julian's latest, but that is not sure.) Also we are
out of time and version 9 is suppose to be editorial (if possible).

So I know it is hard not to Polish, but unless it is an important show
stopper lets get on with what ever else we need to do and leave this alone.

Nothing in what I said should stop important changes, just please ask your
self, is it important enough to perhaps cause yet another iteration.
Remember it will not make the plugfest anyway.

We should be focusing on closure here.  This should apply to all the stuff
we have to do.  If it is a protocol change, you should consider it to be
very important, else forget it.  That is, not to say that we should not
polish the Documents.  We Should.


.
.
.
John L. Hufferd
Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403,  eFax: (408) 904-4688
Home Office (408) 997-6136
Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com