FCIP and iFCP Keying Problem

[Black_David@emc.com]

Both FCIP and iFCP intend to require:

	- IKE with pre-shared keys MUST implement
	- IKE with public-key based keys MAY implement
	- IKE Main Mode MUST implement
	- IKE Aggressive Mode MAY implement

That's not acceptable because the result of combining
the two mandatory (MUST) mechanisms is vulnerable to a
man-in-the-middle attack.

If IKE with pre-shared keys is "MUST implement" (which
makes sense, as it's the simplest IKE authentication
mechanism), then:
	- IKE Aggressive Mode needs to be "MUST implement"
	- Use of IKE Main Mode with pre-shared keys needs
		to be "SHOULD NOT use" or "MUST NOT use".
Alternatively, if IKE Aggressive Mode remains "MAY implement",
then:
	- IKE with signature authentication based on public
		keys needs to be "MUST implement" along with
		some certificate usage guidelines.
	- Pre-Shared keys needs to be "MAY implement" (can't
		be any stronger than the requirement for
		IKE Aggressive Mode).
	- Use of IKE Main Mode with pre-shared keys needs
		to be "SHOULD not use" or "MUST not use".

Changing IKE to remove the Main Mode vulnerability
with pre-shared keys is not a viable approach.

Sorry,
--David

---------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 435-1000 x75140     FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500
black_david@emc.com       Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
---------------------------------------------------