Re: Target Reset

["Eddy Quicksall" <ESQuicksall@hotmail.com>]

The problem is that Microsoft has not told us if they will be using that
yet. And, if they do use it in the future, it won't be used on legacy
systems.

Eddy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peglar, Robert" <robert_peglar@xiotech.com>
To: "'Eddy Quicksall'" <ESQuicksall@hotmail.com>; "Dillard, David"
<david_dillard@adaptec.com>; "John Hufferd" <hufferd@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 3:19 PM
Subject: RE: Target Reset


> Forgive my stepping into this thread, but
> would not PERSISTENT RESERVE OUT/IN (10) suffice?
> (SPC 7.12,7.13).  Seems like bus reset is a
> somewhat hard approach to perform reservation
> management.
>
> Rob
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eddy Quicksall [mailto:ESQuicksall@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:44 AM
> > To: Dillard, David; John Hufferd
> > Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> > Subject: Re: Target Reset
> >
> >
> > I am wondering how clustering will work on NT without some
> > sort of reset.
> >
> > On parallel SCSI, NT will issue a SCSI BUS RESET to break reservations
> > during a challenge for the quorum drive.
> >
> > On iSCSI, there is no full equivalent to the SCSI BUS RESET so I would
> > assume the NT driver would have to issue a TARGET RESET to
> > each target that
> > it is supporting.
> >
> > How would you propose this would be done without a TARGET RESET?
> >
> > Eddy
> >
> >
>