RE: iSCSI: Naming and Discovery Draft...

[Joshua Tseng <jtseng@NishanSystems.com>]

Tanjore,

See below:
> 
> Voruganti,
> 
> 
> 
> 	Here are some minor comments/feedback reading this document.
> 	
> 	1. Section 5.2 Discovery Domain
> 	
> 		DD Symbolic name
> 		DD ID
> 		
> 		DD Member: WWUI
> 		DD Member: IP Address
> 		
> 		
> 	What does this DD member signify, is this one iSCSI device
> 	part of Discovery Domain or should this be a list of 
> iSCSI devices
> 	in that Discovery Domain.  I thought clarifying that would be
> 	usefull for the reader. Frankly, I didnot understand what it is?

There is an error in this model which will be corrected in
the next revision of this document and the iSNS document.
DD_MEMBER should be another object in the model which is
contained by DISCOVERY_DOMAIN.  DD_Member is an attribute
which identifies the WWUI or IP address that is a member
of the Discovery Domain.  DD_ID is another attribute of
the DD_MEMBER object that identifies the DISCOVERY_DOMAIN
of the member.

Josh
> 	
> 	
> 	2. Appendix A iSCSI WWUI Notes...
> 	
> 		It looks to me the examples under
> 		
> "Using Intitiator and Target WWUI During Login" can be 
> clubbed with Appendix B
> which provides the  different iSCSI Login Scenarios" It looks 
> like some
> of the scenarios presented are also in the Appendix B already 
> which seems
> to convey the same thing. 
> 
> 
> 	3. Appendix B, B.4.5,
> 	  Target Conflict 45 doesnot seem to be appropriate.
> 		
> 		I have not reviewed all the documents yet to give a 
> 		recommendation and hence cannot give, but feel 
> 		" Target Conflict" doesnot
> 		convey the meaning of the Scenario indicating
> 		case of " simple devices that can handle one device or
> 		the target had reached the limit of its 
> Initiators' capacity."
> 
> 	
> 	
> 	4. Typo in page 17
> 	
> 	Directory Agent(DA) is an optional part of discovery. If a DA..
> 	
> 	......... by the user Agents, to reduce the network 
> load of all UAs
> 	trying to discovery all SAs
> 		  ^^^^^^^^ should be "discover".
> 		  
> Thanks
> sureshtk
> 
> 	
> 	
>