RE: ISCSI: Urgent pointer consensus

[Black_David@emc.com]

> > I also believe that based on discussion on the list, WG rough consensus
> > does NOT exist for requiring this use of the URG flag and Urgent
pointer,
> > (too many people have objected to making them mandatory), and hence
> > the current "MUST" will have to be replaced.
>
> Um, who, besides Doug, has objected?  Seems to me most of the discussion
has
> been centered around why it would be useful.  Once the reason(s) have been
> explained, I don't see too much dissention.

That's not what I see on the list.  For starters, Daniel Smith,
Glen Turner, and Ronald Lee have objected to the mechanism
or specifically to making it mandatory, and I think Silvano
Gai just added himself to that list.  More people can probably
be found by searching the list archives.  Please don't confuse
having the last word with winning the argument.

Thanks,
--David

---------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 435-1000 x75140     FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500
black_david@emc.com       Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
---------------------------------------------------