RE: iSCSI sessions: Step 2

[Stephen Byan <Stephen.Byan@quantum.com>]

Black_David@emc.com [mailto:Black_David@emc.com] wrote:

> Now comes the hard part - Symmetric vs. modified
> Pure Symmetric (modified by [5] above).  There are
> over 1000 email messages in my mailbox for the ips
> mailing list for the past two months, and I freely
> admit to not having reviewed them in detail.  I suggested
> in the "Let's try again" email that more weight should
> be given to those working on implementations, especially
> hardware, and have not seen any objections to that
> suggestion.  My impression is that the opinion of such
> people has been in favor of the Symmetric model -
> Matt Wakeley (Agilent), and Somesh Gupta (HP) come
> to mind as examples.  I'm not confident that this is
> the WG consensus, but it appears to me that the
> WG is headed in that direction.  Please comment on
> this - the absence of comments/objections will be
> taken as a sign of agreement.

I've been neutral on this issue for quite some time. Perhaps others are also
neutral, which may lead to the appearance of a lack of concensus. 

I'm biased toward symmetric sessions by personal aethestic opinion, as the
design feels cleaner, but I do not have any objective technical arguments
against asymmetric sessions. I think either can be made to work. As far as
I'm concerned, I'd accept the results of a coin-toss.

Regards,
-Steve

Steve Byan
<stephen.byan@quantum.com>
Design Engineer
MS 1-3/E23
333 South Street
Shrewsbury, MA 01545
(508)770-3414
fax: (508)770-2604