|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: New List: rdma@cisco.com: to discuss RDMA
csapuntz@cisco.com wrote:
>
> Does anybody on the list object to specifying an RDMA mechanism for
> use with iSCSI? Does anybody on the list object to mandating an RDMA
> mechanism? Please include your reasons.
Mandate: strongly against.
Recommend: neutral, slightly favorable.
Unless...
By `mandate' you mean supporting a TEXT flag
com.cisco.RDMAEnableRFCxxxx: goforit
to which the target can respond
com.cisco.RDMAEnableRFCxxxx: nowaybuddy
because the target does not have enough system privilage to alter any TCP
options.
Daniel Smith.
--
IBM Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099, USA
K65B/C2 Phone: +1(408)927-2072 Fax: +1(408)927-3010
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:02 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |