SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI Autosense



    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
    > Peter Johansson
    > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 5:56 PM
    > To: IP Storage
    > Subject: RE: iSCSI Autosense
    >
    >
    > At 11:44 AM 8/29/00, Douglas Otis wrote:
    >
    > >It would be nice to assume all devices and initiators support ACA and
    > >Autosense but a network transport does not by necessity exclude devices
    > >that do not.
    >
    > Doug, would you clarify for me please?
    >
    > Do you mean to say:
    >
    > a) A network transport MUST not exclude certain devices;
    > b) A network transport SHOULD not exclude certain devices; or
    > c) Something else.
    
    SAM provides a means of enabling Autosense that can be refused.  iSCSI
    instead defaults with Autosense.  Autosense is problematic on devices that
    only support CA.  It would be nice if everything looked the same, but is it
    safe to require a kludge emulating ACA in this case when simply disabling
    Autosense provides a cleaner solution?  Yes, I know FC requires Autosense,
    but is iSCSI limited to just newer devices?
    
    Doug
    
    > I think it is perfectly reasonable for iSCSI to profile the SAM features
    > required of devices that wish to use iSCSI---and eminently reasonable to
    > require such devices to support autosense!
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Peter Johansson
    >
    > Congruent Software, Inc.
    > 98 Colorado Avenue
    > Berkeley, CA  94707
    >
    > (510) 527-3926
    > (510) 527-3856 FAX
    >
    > PJohansson@ACM.org
    >
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:40 2001
6315 messages in chronological order