SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI - decimal coded binary strings - a proposed resolution




    thanks - julo


    "Randy Jennings" <randyj@data-transit.com>

    07/10/2002 08:02 PM
    Please respond to "Randy Jennings"

           
            To:        Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, "Paul Koning" <ni1d@arrl.net>
            cc:        "ips" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
            Subject:        RE: iSCSI - decimal coded binary strings - a proposed resolution

           


    > >  Julian> decimal-constant: an unsigned decimal number - the digit 0 or
    > >  Julian> a string of 1 or more digits starting with a non-zero digit.
    > >  Julian> Decimal-constants are used to encode numerical values or
    > >  Julian> binary strings. Decimal constants can be used to encode
    > >  Julian> binary strings only if the stringlength is explicitly
    > >  Julian> speci-fied. There is no implicit length for decimal
    > >  Julian> strings. This encoding MUST NOT used for numerical values
    > >  Julian> equal or greater than 2**64 or binary strings that could be
    > >  Julian> longer than 64 bits.

    Here is the problem:
    Do you mean (parentheses added):

    This encoding MUST NOT used for (numerical values equal or greater than
    2**64) or (binary strings that could be longer than 64 bits).

    or:

    This encoding MUST NOT used for (numerical values equal or greater than
    2**64 or binary strings) that could be longer than 64 bits.

    The first is admittedly the more logical choice, but it is not the only
    choice.  I originally read it as the second and wondered what Paul's issue
    was.

    This is the editorial clarity issue that David Black is talking about.  I
    remember having this issue with spec 11 when I was primarily learning the
    spec. However, as I care more about decoding the info instead of writing a
    protocol state machine, I did not make note of these problems.  I apologize
    for not going over spec 12-(15?) closely.  These issues may have been
    addressed by other editorial comments, but when adding text, it should be
    carefully scrutinized as well.

    With a 'for' in front of binary strings, the sentence can only be
    interpreted one way.  From your following email is the wording intended.

    Sincerely,
    Randy
    Data Transit





Home

Last updated: Mon Jul 15 19:18:52 2002
11330 messages in chronological order