SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI: DLB-T.26 (response for TASK REASSIGN)



    As before - there is already text and commented issue dealing with that.
    Julo
    
    
                                                                                                                                                
                          Black_David@emc.c                                                                                                     
                          om                       To:       cbm@rose.hp.com, ips@ece.cmu.edu                                                   
                          Sent by:                 cc:                                                                                          
                          owner-ips@ece.cmu        Subject:  RE: iSCSI: DLB-T.26 (response for TASK REASSIGN)                                   
                          .edu                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                                
                          07/10/2002 10:56                                                                                                      
                          AM                                                                                                                    
                          Please respond to                                                                                                     
                          Black_David                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                                
    
    
    
    Ok with an upper case MUST for sending the TMF response
    first, please.  Thanks, --David
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Mallikarjun C. [mailto:cbm@rose.hp.com]
    > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 3:21 PM
    > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    > Subject: iSCSI: DLB-T.26 (response for TASK REASSIGN)
    >
    >
    > > [T.26] 9.6  Task Management Function Response
    > >
    > >    For the functions ABORT TASK, ABORT TASK SET, CLEAR ACA, CLEAR TASK
    > >    SET, LOGICAL UNIT RESET, TARGET COLD RESET and TARGET WARM RESET,
    the
    > >    target performs the requested Task Management function and sends a
    > >    Task Management Response back to the initiator.
    > >
    > > TASK REASSIGN does not get a response.  Was this intended?
    >
    > It may be appropriate to include it in this list, but then it
    > would be nice to make sure that the
    > target sends the response to the TMF first before acting on
    > the reassigned task (which might
    > possibly involve retransmitting an old status sent before the
    > connection failure with a new StatSN).
    > Initiators may get confused if the response for the
    > reassigned task arrives prior to the the response
    > to the TMF itself (even while there are no StatSN holes).
    >
    > I suggest:
    >
    > For all the task management functions defined in 9.5.1, the
    > target performs the requested function and sends a
    > Task Management Response back to the initiator.  In the case
    > of the TASK REASSIGN function, the target must
    > send the reponse to the task management function request
    > first before acting on the reassigned task.
    >
    >
    > Mallikarjun
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Wed Jul 10 15:18:54 2002
11248 messages in chronological order