Re: Minor nit on changes to past versions

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

The change is log is just a "memento".  It will not survive last call (not interesting for readers) and it was not meant to be a rigorous description of changes.
If there are errors in it those are part of the history like anything else and as I said we should not rewrite it.

Julo

Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@wasabisystems.com> 04/19/2002 07:01 PM Please respond to Bill Studenmund

To:        Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL         cc:        <ips@ece.cmu.edu>         Subject:        Re: Minor nit on changes to past versions

On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Julian Satran wrote:

> Yes but we do not rewrite history :-)  Julo

I think we might be on different pages (or I'm confused). My question is
more, aren't LogoutLoginMin and LogoutLoginMax typos for
LogoutLoginMinTime and LogoutLoginMaxTime? And to the extent they are
typos shouldn't they be fixed? I understand not changing them to
DefaultTime2Wait & DefaultTime2Retain, and that's not what I was asking.

As it stands, the change entry 'allow 0 in LogoutLoginMax and Min' comes
out of nowhere and goes right back; nothing else in the document refers to
LogoutLoginMax. So we have a change entry that changes something future
readers can't find. Assuming it's not a typo. If it's a typo, can't we
just fix it? i.e. 'allow 0 in LogoutLoginMaxTime and MinTime'

Take care,

Bill